Wave Strategy Home Forums Trader’s Forum Wave Analysis

Tagged: 

This topic contains 84 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  SACHIN DIVAKAR 1 day, 20 hours ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #211113 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY WEKLY

  • #211546 Reply
    Profile photo ofashishkyal
    Ashish Kyal, CMT

    Amazing counts…

    • #217469 Reply

      vikas mittal

      hi sachin ,

       

      i am vikas mittal and i have joined the mentorship program with Ashish , can you please send me the neoplot excel file so i can start from here onwards , since you will have the updated sheet .

      mail id : vm@novaformworks.com

  • #212391 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    GANN SQR OF 9

  • #212408 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    Neowave Nifty Daily

    • #212455 Reply

      Hemang Parikh

      Hi Sachin,

      Can you please explain how 100% projection for wave C is placed at 10740?

      Because wave A was 7500 to 9900(2400 points)

      If wave B completed at 8996.

      Then 100% comes around 11300(9900+2400)

      • #212587 Reply

        SACHIN DIVAKAR

        In this Alteration as per Neowave previous trend normally end higher / lower    low/high so Wave-A starts{Black Circle } @ 8056 . WAVE C= A will be near 10864 . I have taken Gann level 10740 for swing low of 7500 as posted in above chart

  • #212412 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY WEEKLY NEOWAVE EXT TRGL

    • #212599 Reply
      Profile photo ofashishkyal
      Ashish Kyal

      Sachin but if you marking ABC rise with wave A corrective and wave B not retracing more than 61.8% so it is neither Zigzag nor Flat..

      • #212693 Reply

        SACHIN DIVAKAR

        Yes sir not ZZ . We can (Can We ? )consider Flat when Wave-[B] Retraced 61% or ( Less) of Wave-[A]  ,its mandatory to Wave-[C] Retrace all of Wave-B . ( In MEW Mr. Glenn has not specified how much less than 61.8% chapter 11-9   .  )

         

         

         

  • #212589 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    https://www.wavesstrategy.com/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/212589/qy17edpc71z30zjk0cj8niqbocc0789n.png

  • #212813 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    MOTILALOSWAL FIN -QUARTERLY

  • #213066 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY PSUBANK QUARTERLY CHARTNIFTYPSUBANK QRT CHART

    • #214440 Reply
      Profile photo ofashishkyal
      Ashish Kyal, CMT

      Very good chart Sachin as per Neo wave. Which stock is this?

      • #214603 Reply

        SACHIN DIVAKAR

        NIFTY PSU BANK INDEX

         

  • #213710 Reply

    Abhishek Patel

    Is It Possible For NIFTY ??

  • #214437 Reply
    Profile photo ofashishkyal
    Ashish Kyal, CMT

    Abhishek your count is not proper…

  • #214646 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY WEEKLY NEOWAVE CHART

    • #214700 Reply

      Hemang Parikh

      Hi Sachin,

       

      In your wave count,it’s also possible that wave C/D/E  is only Wave C(3-3-3 pattern) then wave F is actually wave D.

      And rise from 8800 is actually wave E.

      It will make Expanding triangle pattern and if we calculate time wise and price wise each leg will be higher in the time and price.

       

      Regards,

      Hemang Parikh

      • #214877 Reply

        SACHIN DIVAKAR

        If consider only by Shape it looks Expanding Tgl , but to pass test of triangle it’s apex point (if u extend backward b-d a-c lines )goes in deep nov2019 .Apex point not near to start / end  of wave A  So i eliminated that expanding Tgl count . After post pattern completion wave C may retrace less (as in Exp Tgl ) . Pattern is well positioned in Channel form so gone of Neowave count Alteration.

      • #215180 Reply
        Profile photo ofashishkyal
        Ashish Kyal, CMT

        Possibility of a Neutral Triangle or Diametric as per Hemang not Expanding triangle is also very well open with only wave E ongoing as of now. My exact count is what Sachin has posted but keeping alternative possibilities open for now.

  • #215718 Reply

    harshit mavani

    hi… please tell me how to plot neo-wave chart.. is there any software to plot it..? thanks..

  • #216045 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    S&P 500 WEEKLY NEOWAVE CHART

    S&P 500 WEEKLY CHART ALTERATION 1

  • #216433 Reply
    Profile photo ofashishkyal
    Ashish Kyal, CMT

    I am not ruling out the double corrective possibility given that the corrections are taking more time than the preceding impulse patterns.

  • #216684 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTYDAILY NEO 17JUN2020

  • #216784 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY 5 MIN CHART STUDY

  • #217132 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY DAILY NEOWAVE COUNT

    nifty daily

    • #217496 Reply

      Hemang Parikh

      Hi Sachin,

       

      Post G wave completion between 10600-11000 do you think it will be only wave X on downside or fresh down move?

      Any technique we can guess in advance?

  • #217572 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    In FLAT PAT WAVE-[B] TAKE MORE TIME THAN WAVE-[A] .
    HOW MUCH IS QUEST . IT IS NORMALLY 2-4 TIMES .
    GLENN NEELY SAYS MORE THAN THAT (5-7 TIMES),it becomes suspicious .

    So i am taking Wave-[B] upto 25july 3 times of wave -[A] (remember Wave-[A] in this count is terminated @7500 )

    Wave [B] gives following data points

    1)In larger degree no wave has been retraced 100% & in less time period than advances.
    2)we are in Higher High -Higher Low setup within channel formation .

    POST pat correction retracement is dependent on where Wave [B] ends &
    last structure of pattern within wave -[B] that could break Inclined channel lower boundary or not
    Within channel sharp reracement of 62% of PREV ADVANCE will signal still advancement is there

    (as happened last week upto 9545).

    Within channel or else only double 2/3 combination is allowed if u r not considering whole as dimetric pat.

    AFTER wave- g , X or Wave- [C] will start ?

    Wave- [C] will take TIME as much as (wave [A] + WAVE [B]) /2 .
    Magnitude of wave [C] depends on where Wave- [B] ends 62% of wave [A] & power of

    wave – g formation.

    SO MONOWAVE RETRACMENTS , ADVANCES & TIME TAKEN FOR THAT  can give CLUE .
    (still i m learning so i can give only data points not answers ,
    i have no answers but have alterations )

  • #219395 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY DAILY NEOWAVE CHART

    EXTRACTING TGL

    • #219681 Reply
      Profile photo ofashishkyal
      Ashish Kyal, CMT

      Sachin, for alternate to be a valid Extracting it should come near to the low of B and should be bigger than wave B

      • #219891 Reply

        SACHIN DIVAKAR

        Yes Ashish Sir , as u said Wave -d should be Longest in Extracting Tgl . In count ALT-A ,B, C,D E is of larger degree &
        in Wave ALT-C i labeled in small abcde as Extracting Triangle . Wave Alt-D expecting to come upto 9900-10000 . pat will fail above wave -e level 10417.

  • #219398 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY DAILY DIAMOND

  • #219470 Reply

    Sandeep Ruparel

     

    Hello Sachin,

    Is the above a possible alteration? Thanks.

    • #219573 Reply

      SACHIN DIVAKAR

      on lower degree i can take such count but not on Higher Degree (the Diametric as a single wave ).

      Instead it is easy to consider current fall (as it is Violent) as  Wave  A or X & ignore Historical data for now .

      dont go in complexity .try lesser monowaves 13 – 34 at a time .

  • #219599 Reply

    Sandeep Ruparel

    thanks. here’s an alternate.

    • #219656 Reply

      SACHIN DIVAKAR

      Hi sandeep , in hindsight u can label waves , but wave analysis is not only of counting / labeling Mono/ poly wave . It is also about behavior of waves which tells you what is Next coming ? Behavior of current wave is linked with previous wave . so start observing on at least on weekly waves so u can understand behavior (of waves & also of u ). so take 10553 high  low 9545 start analyzing waves

      • #219965 Reply

        Sandeep Ruparel

        Thanks!

    • #219680 Reply
      Profile photo ofashishkyal
      Ashish Kyal, CMT

      This impulse is not valid count.

  • #219685 Reply

    Rahul Hare

    Hi Sachin , on your graph of 27th June, why have you taken retracement calculation from 8673 level ?

    • #219874 Reply

      SACHIN DIVAKAR

       

      hi Rahul

      8673 is 62% of Wave- B ( if it assumed to be completed as per this count ). so i take that as a target & modify fibb0 from 10553 to 8673 . so get closer outlook of fibbo levels . Nothing special / important abt this . cause we always respect 62% of prev wave & then take decision .

      • #219946 Reply

        Mehul

        to simplify  sachin,  is yr understanding claiming we r in for 8673 from here on ,,, today 10350 or do we revisit 10550/10650 n then retrace in mini waves till 8673.  things r little confusing. pls guide thanks

        • #220296 Reply

          SACHIN DIVAKAR

          Mehul , Don’t get confused & don’t take it as Claim .

          When 7511 bottom was in Place after violent downfall , as wave practitioner one has to expect in first place min 62% retracement of prev   wave will happen .And start analyzing which patterns are going to form . And mkt is @ 62% . so i have to start analyzing Top Out is happening or not or this correction is going to continue for more time and to find signal .

          when this pat unfold , for downside i will take 62% of Top (Wave B ) for guidance not for target

  • #220216 Reply

    mahadev patil

  • #220218 Reply

    mahadev patil

  • #220219 Reply

    mahadev patil

  • #220246 Reply

    Ashish Kyal
    Keymaster

    Wave 2 cannot form a triangle Mahadev. Diametric looks good

    • #220762 Reply

      mahadev patil

      yes sir thank you it may be the part of earlier correction

  • #220652 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    S&P 500 – Two Alterations

    S&P 500 2 ALTERATION

  • #220805 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY HALF YEAR NEOWAVE CHART

    We R Entering in Potential Reversal Zone . From lower degree, we can get signal (pattern) of Reversal.

    1993-2003–2013 BOTTOM formation Years . Next is 2023?

    NIFTY HALF YR NEOWAVE CHART

    • #220849 Reply

      mahadev patil

      c length after A may be more time and price wise

      • #220887 Reply

        SACHIN DIVAKAR

        Yes Mahadev It is .

        • #220889 Reply

          mahadev patil

          can that C need to consider as C

  • #220850 Reply

    mahadev patil

  • #220894 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    All Legends like R N Elliott , Mr. Glenn Neely & Ashish Kyal Sir . आपको गुरु पूर्णिमा का सादर प्रणाम

    https://www.wavesstrategy.com/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/220894/nhx3d3cmgcs701o45o4kvzoxr41wzjkc.jpg

  • #220945 Reply

    Rahul Hare

    Not trying to catch any top here but momentum is definitely slowing down.  Wit hTime cycles showing today / tomo as a day for topping out , below  Neo wave calculation on daily time frame as below..

    E seems to have reached equality with C ( price basis at 10810 levels ), though on time it has taken almost twice that of C .. For F to do a time equality with B ( 4 bars)  and 61.8% of B wiould take it to 10250 levels ( almost at the trendline )  by this week.

    Though as long as 10150 and 10190 levels  the real bearish move wouldn’t have started and we will have a G which if follows 61.8% price eqaulity to A should take us to 11100 levels , which is also 76.4% retracement zone from the 7500 levels..

     

    The other alternative is  this is already G and with price equality to A could take out 11k on its own ( though on time quality it would have taken almost 4 times that of A )

    Key levels to watch for the downside of wave F are 10600 and 10450 .

     

    Lets me know if this makes sense ..

    nifty

    • #221007 Reply

      SACHIN DIVAKAR

      Hi Rahul , 1st sentence that ” U r Not trying to catch Top / Bottom ” seems to be Wrong (for Me ) .when u r using Neowave Analysis it is used / Build  for Forecasting .  It Helps us to take decisions whether to trade or not at Extreme Levels . unless we observe /practice / analyse  how Tops / Bottoms forms ?  It has no use .

      Pattern may Fail , but while Failing it will give that Signal too .  we need to Practice Predictable & Un Predictable phases in Patterns / waves . It is not Shameful to Forecast / Predict &  wrong in forecasting . we r analyzing Behavior of Waves formed due Mass Psychology . If Tendulkar / Dhoni Forecast (Guess) how Bowler will ball  & arrange position / shot for it . DATA Analytics in FootBall / cricket observes lots of players & their games , to make strategies .  It is like CHESS , observe Patterns that r forming & make move .

      In this Uncertain world certainly Uncertainty will Remain  for ever .  So while using Forecasting Theory u have to be better Foresight which comes from Observing History of Wave forms .  So we r using Neowave  theory for forecasting  accept it .

  • #220891 Reply

    mahadev patil
    • #221319 Reply

      Ashish Kyal
      Keymaster

      Post chart directly here instead of link as it becomes very convenient…

  • #221401 Reply

    mahadev patil

  • #221405 Reply

    mahadev patil

  • #221404 Reply

    mahadev patil

  • #221550 Reply

    mahadev patil

  • #223903 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY NEOWAVE WEEKLY UPDATE

    DISC–PLEASE DON’T TAKE IT AS RECOMMENDATION . IT IS STUDY BASED ON NEOWAVE THEORY.

    NIFTY WEEKLY

     

  • #224235 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    Ashish Sir,

    Thanks for Allowing  to share / post  analysis in Forum .

    As there is Risk of ” Anyone Taking CALL on shared Analysis / Study ” , I m Stopping  Posts . Thank you all .

    Bye………………..

    • #225494 Reply
      Profile photo ofashishkyal
      Ashish Kyal, CMT

      Hi Sachin, I want to empower traders with right type of charts and studies and you are doing amazing work on posting it across. As you are posting charts justifying your views you can continue to do so as it will help traders take more informed decisions understanding the risk associated.

  • #225337 Reply

    mahadev patil

  • #226017 Reply

    mahadev patil

  • #226018 Reply

    mahadev patil

    (d)  or it might be X wave

  • #226448 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    RELIANCE QUARTERLY NEOWAVE CHART

     

  • #226449 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    RELIANCE QUARTERLY NEOWAVE CHART

     

    • #229858 Reply
      Profile photo ofashishkyal
      Ashish Kyal, CMT

      Good counts on Reliance, It fits the Triangle target as well. C rise looks non impulsive though, check on smaller time frames

  • #229692 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY NEOWAVE DIMETRIC CHART STUDY

  • #229693 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY NEOWAVE DAILY CHART STUDY – WAVE G

  • #229864 Reply
    Profile photo ofashishkyal
    Ashish Kyal, CMT

    This is my preferred as well but only apprehension is that wave g has consumed too much time compared to other legs so possibility of wave x cannot be ruled out.

  • #230569 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    Ashish Sir,

    One suggestion,  pls arrange charts as lastly posted first (latest dated first) .

  • #232061 Reply
    Profile photo ofashishkyal
    Ashish Kyal, CMT

    Sure, let me see how is it possible

  • #235544 Reply

    mahadev patil

  • #235545 Reply

    mahadev patil

  • #237661 Reply

    mahadev patil
  • #238992 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY DAILY NEOWAVE

    FROM LAST POST DATED 12 AUG 2020 | DOUBLE COMBINATION ALTERATION 

  • #239018 Reply

    SACHIN DIVAKAR

    NIFTY WEEKLY NEOWAVE ALTERATION-1

Reply To: Wave Analysis
Your information: